Agriculture Fighting Climate Change

Our current agricultural practices are a majorpaddock prior to planting the target species.  For
contributor to climate change. A whopping 14% ofexample, let's say our target species is corn. 
all greenhouse gas emissions are attributed to thePrior to the corn being planted in spring, a
way we grow, process, distribute and consumegreen-manure crop, such as oats, is planted out in
food, and an additional 18% are due toautumn and allowed to grow through winter.  In
deforestation largely driven by the clearing ofspring, the oats are tilled into the soil and the corn
forests for agricultural land.  This problem canis sown.  This is an excellent way of building soil
only intensify as our population grows.  Imaginebiomass and soil nutrients; however, you still have
how many more greenhouse gasses will bethe negative effects of soil tillage, mainly the
pumped into our atmosphere in 2050 when therelease of carbon into the atmosphere.
estimated world population reaches 9.1 billion. As you can see, both no-till and organic agriculture
Without a drastic change to the way we producehave their pros and cons.  No-till methods store
food, we simply won't survive.    ­­­carbon but rely on chemicals.  Organic farming
Traditional agriculture, and even organic agriculture,uses no chemicals but relies on tilling.
relies heavily on tilling the soil to prepare theA method that combined the soil protection of
ground for planting.  Tilling, however, has ano-till farming and the non-toxicity of organic
number of undesirable side-effects, such as: soilfarming would be ideal – agricultural heaven. 
erosion, loss of organic matter, destruction ofThere are people around the world who are
living soil microbes, dependence on heavyworking towards this ideal.  These pioneers,
machinery, loss of soil structure, loss of nutrientsreferred to as no-till organic farmers, are still
and soil compaction.  However, there is anotherworking out a few bugs.
negative side-effect of tilling that many peopleWith this revolutionary method, a green-manure
may be unaware of, and that is carboncover crop is planted out prior to the target
oxidization.  Tilling causes the carbon in the soil tocrop.  However, when the time comes to plant
be oxidized which releases it (the carbon) into thethe target species, the green-manure crop is not
atmosphere.  This, of course, increasestilled into the soil, and neither is it killed with
greenhouse gasses and contributes to climateherbicide.  Rather than being tilled or sprayed, the
change.green-manure crop is killed using a mechanical
Over the past 30 -40 years there have beenmethod called crinking.  A large roller with blunt
people experimenting with no-till agriculture.  No-tillblades set at intervals is rolled over the
agriculture uses a range of practices so that tillinggreen-manure crop.  The blades crink, but not
is rarely or never used, resulting in the followingcut, the stems of the cover crop.  It also
advantages: improved soil structure, better waterflattens the cover crop so that it becomes a
and nutrient holding capacity and less use ofdense, dead organic matt covering the soil.  Then
machinery.  However, one of the biggestseed is sown using a direct-drilling method through
advantages of no-till agriculture is that the soil canthe dead matt.  The dead green-manure crop is
store much more carbon.  This means that therestill attached to the soil via its dying roots.  This
will be more carbon in the plants and soil and lessoffers excellent soil protection and the dense
in the atmosphere.  In other words, agriculturematt offers weed suppression and moisture
has the potential to become a fighter againstretention.  It also increases soil biomass and builds
climate change.  Wouldn't that be a turnaround?nutrients.
So far, no-till agriculture has been heavilyThe beauty of this method is the fact that
dependent on herbicides.  When I attendedagricultural land can act as a giant carbon sink. 
agricultural college in the late eighties, no-tillThis is a complete turnaround as agriculture is
agriculture was in its early developmental stages. presently a major producer of greenhouse
It was seen as unorthodox and alternative – agasses.  It is believed that no-till farming has the
little way out.  We were taught that paddockspotential to store a staggering 3000 pounds (1360
needed to be sprayed out with herbicide first. kilograms) of carbon per acre.  No-till organic
The dead plants, which were called stubble, werefarming has the potential to become a major
left standing.  Then seed was sown through thefighter against climate change, and provide
stubble, using a direct-drilling method.  The stubblehealthy, chemical-free food at the same time.
offered soil protection and increased biomass,On a small scale, no-till organic food production is
which is great.  However, the method wasactually very easy.  Food4wealth is an ideal
completely dependant on chemical herbicides.example of this revolutionary way of producing
The organic industry, which is generally seen as anfood.  Food4wealth is a small-scale,
environmentally positive industry, does things quiteeasy-to-follow, organic food-growing method that
differently.  They use a combination ofretains a dense coverage of plants and uses no
green-manure crops and tilling.  Green-manuretilling.  A food4wealth plot is just like a
crops, such as oats, millet, clover, and manymini-carbon sink.  It takes carbon from the
more, are commonly used and sown into aatmosphere and turns it into healthy, organic food.