How Healthy Are School Lunches - In Practice?

There's a crisis in health looming in the West. It's- buy from a store on their route to school or --
not just those poisons in the air. It's not onlyin some cases --
because of the couch potato culture. It's not even- go outside the school at lunchtime to find
in our gross overeating, per se. It's because of awhatever is hawked at the gates or in shops
revolution in the way we bring up our kids tonearby. And they often have plenty of money to
choose their food. And the School Meals debate isbuy what they wish.
just a part of it.Younger children tend to be given less choice, so
School Meals the Old Waythey're more likely to get the intended nutrition.
I've eaten school meals now for over half aI've noticed, though, that in schools which allow a
century -- I used to be a teacher after I was awide choice of menus, the actual pattern of
kid. And I've watched the food quality and eatingeating can be very different to the intent of the
patterns of school children change radically. I knowmenu planners. Kids will pick what they want from
that, years ago, school meals were home-cookedthe menu, given the opportunity, and if choices
on site, from high-quality ingredients. Meals wereare limited to sets of balanced items, they'll just
always provided complete, and to a menuleave what they don't like. In fact, they'll behave
intended to be nutritionally sound by the standardsjust as children always have, given an open choice
of the day. Both in the USA and the UK, parentsand no guidelines they're prepared to accept!
were determined that their kids would have aSo the standard of nutrition, which is itself often
good mid-day meal, whether they were rich orvery questionable, is no standard at all if the
poor. And it was so.children can circumvent it. The result is a range in
Until money and convenience began to countthe actual nutrition that children get in their
more. Until children found that they had a reallunchtime meal, from excellent to poor nutrition;
power to choose -- including the power to choosenot good, unless the child chooses well.
to eat badly. And addictive, high-fat, sugar-rich,And that brings us to the point of this article:
nutrient-poor food -- treats, really -- began slowlychoice.
to dominate the average kid's diet.- Do children get too much choice, with too little
Commerce and the Bottom Lineguidance on how to exercise it?
In the UK, school meals began to be contracted- Do they learn -- maybe by adult example -- to
out to the commercial world in the 1980s, with achoose what feels good at the time and succumb
price-led bottom line. On average, micro-nutrientto addiction, whatever the consequences?
quality took a big nose-dive. Some authorities- Do they get too little help in choosing wisely?
embraced the cost cutting enthusiastically, and at- Are they influenced by clever, expensive
least one county I know had to shut theiradvertising to crave and buy hugely-profitable
disreputable service because it eventually got suchjunk foods?
a small take-up.I reckon it's usually yes, yes, yes and yes. And
In the USA, it's been a more creeping diseasethat's why I think school meals are just a
since the 1960s, led by big enterprises like Generalsymptom of a bleak future healthwise for our
Foods. They offered to provide commercial,young people. Choice without informed
processed meals at a good price point and toresponsibility is no choice at all.
government standards under the School MealsThe Future
Initiative, and harassed school boards loved it!The answer? Information and education,
Worse, from the Reagan years, vending machinespresented well, so that kids will enjoy learning. It's
became commonplace and the quality of 'real'beginning to resurge in the USA and Canada, (see
school meals slipped further -- even ketchupthe book Lunch Lessons: Changing the Way We
became classed as a 'vegetable'!Feed Our Children by Ann Cooper). There's also a
But there are two issues here. First, what kind ofstrong groundswell of action towards improving
food was said to be 'fit for purpose' by thekids' nutrition that has been influential for some
makers, and second, what did the kids actuallyyears in the UK, aided recently by a public
eat? After all, you can lead a horse...campaign by TV chef Jamie Oliver. In the end,
Nutrition and School Mealsthough, where are the major influences? I reckon
The US Food And Drugs Administration setsit's:
standards for its people's nutrition, as does theParents, first -- as prime influence from an early
Department for Health in the UK. These areage, there's no stronger model for eating choices
based on what expert opinion says is a healthyas long as the parents are intending to influence
diet. Leaving aside what the experts themselveschoice. And so it should be, unless this influence is
eat, you'd expect them to recommend for kidsspoiling the health of our young people. Then
what research has told them is good for us. Ormaybe the parents need some information and
would they? They won't set 'impossible' guidelines,education.
after all. Whoever provides it, school food todayAdvertising, second. Maybe I'm being a little
is restricted by three controls: price, nutrition andcynical, but it's probably accurate to say that
acceptability.effective advertising, with older children, is more
Too high a cost would be unacceptable toinfluential than their parents. It also influences their
parents, and there would be no pointpeer group's choices, which is another major
recommending meals which most children wouldinfluence on each one. I'm maybe thinking about
refuse to eat. Nutrition? Notionally, the food islong TV hours.
supposed to be complete nutrition, in case someI'm putting school third. Many schools try hard to
children are poorly fed at home. Standards creep,show kids from a young age the consequences
though. They move with the fashion of the times,of a long-term poor diet. This growing influence
and the current fashion for inexpensive meals isthen has to weigh against the other, powerful
to eat factory-prepared meals in restaurants andmoderators of young behaviour.
at home, with little actual cooking being done onAnd I reckon it's nearly too late for a large
site. In fact, today's young mothers andminority of our youth, because their home
short-order 'chefs' often don't and can't actuallyexample is such a strong negative dampener on
cook food at all! They just reheat and present it.the excellent campaigns now being undertaken in
And such food is notorious for missing some keya lot of schools. If mom and dad, 240 pounds
essential nutrients. And acceptability? Well...each and currently enjoying life and (junk) food,
Choice Is Good. Right? Wrong!are hearing from their kids what sound health will
Choice is king today. Children can:mean to the home food choices, do you think
- refuse to eat the food offered in school,they'll support the message from school?
- eat only the addictive junk element of what'sNot till their diabetes, arthritis and allergies get
available,linked to their diet in their own minds, I think. And
- bring an alternative from home (could be an idealthat could be a decade away, if ever.
meal or pure junk),Poor kids!