The Problem With Purity

This may be a strange topic for someone whopart, you are better off without them. What I am
runs a natural health-oriented web site to bequestioning is the wisdom, practicality and even
writing, but I want to discuss the possibility ofultimate health benefits of trying to be completely
being overzealous about "purity" in one's diet, andpure or perfect. I don't have the statistics on this,
life in general. I recall watching the comedianbut I have observed that many proponents of
George Carlin, whose seemingly absurd outburstsvery strict dietary regimes, such as macrobiotic,
often have a ring of truth, telling the audiencevegan and "100% all natural, no exceptions, ever"
why you are better off eating junk. He alsodiets often live average, sometimes below
reminisced about swimming in the filthy Hudsonaverage life-spans. Could it be that having a
River as a child (as an aside, the Hudson is onebasically relaxed and unstressful attitude towards
rare case where it's actually cleaner now than thelife is even more important than what you eat?
50 or so years ago when Carlin was a child).This is my suspicion. I mean this within reason, of
Carlin's argument, keeping in mind that he is doingcourse. You still have to pay some attention to
a comedy act, is that he developed resistance towhat you eat, how much exercise you get and
pollution and impurities compared to people whoother common sense lifestyle choices. If you
avoid such things. While I would not take thisstudy the eating habits and lifestyles of traditional
argument to an extreme, I do think there ispeople who tended to live long lives, such as the
some truth to it.Hunzas, you find that, in addition to living very
I am all for eating a natural diet consisting, asactive lives physically, they ate a fairly
much as possible, organic ingredients and practicingomniverous (as well as natural) diet. You really
healthy habits in general. When I speak of beingcannot find any traditional diets that are as strict
overzealous, I mean having the mindset that anyas those advocated in many modern books on
of a usually long, often ever-increasing list of "bad"the subject.
things will make you ill, even in small or moderateThis topic reminds me of a very good but not
doses. There are some rigid diets, for example,that popular film by the name of Safe, directed
that forbid consuming any sugar, animal products,by Todd Haynes. In this movie, Julianne Moore
white flour and most commonly consumedplays a troubled Los Angeles housewife who
carbohydrates, caffeine or alcohol. Some rawdevelops an extreme sensitivity to various
foods advocates will tell you that you should onlyenvironmental contaminants. As the film
eat, predictably enough, foods that have not beenprogresses, she becomes more and more
cooked.sensitive until, by the end, she literally has to live
Add to these dietary restrictions notions aboutin an isolated bubble. Now this movie is somewhat
electromagnetic pollution coming from cell phonesambiguous about whether the problem is a toxic
and power lines, second hand smoke,world or an oversensitive person, but I think the
environmental pollution coming from cars andanswer is both.
industry, the uncertain quality of much drinkingWe have to come to terms with the fact that
water (including bottled) and what can we do?world is simply not completely safe or pure. It
Many of these factors are virtually impossible tonever was, and probably never will be. If we
avoid much of the time. Others that we cancannot avoid all impurities, perhaps it makes sense
avoid, such as the dietary ones I just listed, canto, on the one hand, consume high quality foods
result in a quite rigid way of life where one has toand supplements, live as healthy a lifestyle as
live a fairly isolated and insulated existence inpossible in terms of exercise and other beneficial
relation to most of society.practices, but on the other hand to have a kind of
To compound this rigid attitude, many people whorelaxed and perhaps even fatalistic attitude about
aim for a very "pure" way of life also avoidthe impurities that will inevitably intrude on us.
television, the media and other potentiallyThis, rather than an unrealistic policy of strict
corrupting influences. Now I am not trying toavoidance, may give us more resistance to them
advocate any of the products or behaviors thator even allow us to live in harmony with them.
such people are trying to avoid. For the most